FY2017 CoC Competition – Project Ranking

The CoC Application Review Committee has completed its work. The FY2017 CoC application will include the following projects, at the listed funding amounts:

Tier 1

  • HMIS, $61,992
  • CSO-FOH Coordinated Entry, $250,000
  • CSO-FOH PSH, $182,406
  • CSO-FOH PSH 2, $23,856
  • Viability Next Step 2, $104,089
  • CHD Family-Centered PSH, $173,279
  • Viability Next Step, $292,344
  • Catholic Charities RRH 2, $48,472
  • VOC Scattered Site Family Housing, $120,183
  • SMOC Bowdoin-Tranquility House, $62,644
  • CSO-FOH Worthington House Campus, $22,679
  • MHA S+C 13, $110,243
  • Catholic Charities RRH, $49,260
  • Way Finders RRH, $145,837
  • Catholic Charities RRH 3, $332,412
  • MHA S+C Recovery, $144,034
  • RVCC S+C 7, $61,259
  • Way Finders Turning Point, $60,209
  • RVCC S+C 5, $49,273
  • CHD Project Permanence, $150,628
  • MHA S+C 48, $357,375
  • RVCC Residental Support, $180,485
  • Gandara Shine RRH, $169,319
  • Gandara Shine RRH Expansion, $225,057 ($98,107 of this project is in Tier 2)

Tier 2

  • Viability Next Step Holyoke, $107,028
  • MHA Annie’s House, $229,792

New projects this year are Gandara Shine RRH Expansion and Viability Next Step Holyoke.


CoC Projects: Mixing Chronic beds/units and DedicatedPLUS beds/units

One of our Massachusetts colleagues recently asked HUD a question about Chronic and DedicatedPLUS beds. It appears that projects can combine both types of beds in a single project. See the Q & A below. I think the way this would be done is to select the project as DedicatedPLUS, but then also retain the dedicated Chronic designation for some units. In this case, the designated Chronic beds will be for housholds meeting the chronic definition, and the remaining beds will be for households meeting the slightly expanded definition for DedicatedPLUS.

Remember that the CoC will have further conversation about the DedicatedPLUS option after the August 28 competition deadline, and individual projects will be able to change the selected designation after that deadline.

HUD Q and A:

Question Text:

My question is about 3B-1.1 in the CoC Application (not the project application). That question requires us to report the total number of chronic dedicated and the total number of DedicatedPlus beds that appear in the submitted project applications. We have one project that will submit as DedicatedPlus, but it still has some portion of its beds as dedicated for chronic households. Therefore, I’m wondering if in Question 3B-1.1 in the CoC Application we should report all the beds in that project as DedicatedPlus, or separate out the ones that are dedicated to chronic households. For example, there are 100 beds. 75 of them are dedicated to chronic households currently. We are submitting the project as DedicatedPlus, but believe we can maintain the 75 beds as chronic dedicated (leaving 25 to function as DedicatedPlus). Do I report that there are 100 DedicatedPlus beds on Question 3B-1.1 or 25? Thank you.


Thank you for submitting your question.

DedicatedPLUS projects may still choose to dedicate some of their beds to those experiencing chronic homelessness, and in these cases HUD will expect that those beds serve individuals and families meeting HUD’s definition of chronic homelessness and be filled by another chronically homeless participant unless there are no chronically homeless persons located within the CoC’s geographic area. For example, if a new PSH project applies for 100 beds and chooses to dedicate 50 of those beds to individuals and families experiencing chronic homelessness, then HUD will expect that at any given time 50 of the beds be filled by someone who met HUD’s definition of chronic homelessness at project entry. The remaining 50 beds may be used to serve individuals and families meeting the criteria as outlined in Section III.A.3.d. of the FY 2017 CoC Program Competition NOFA. In the scenario described above 50 beds would be listed as Chronically Homeless dedicated beds and 50 as DedicatedPlus beds in 3B-1.1 as these numbers are mutually exclusive.


CoC RFP Guidance and Q & As from 8/15 bidders’ conference

The CoC RFP bidders’ conference took place today. The attached Question and Answer document provides the questions asked prior to and in the bidders’ conference, with responses.

The CoC will continue to take written questions regarding the RFP until Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 5:00 pm. Please submit questions in writing to gmccafferty@springfieldcityhall.com.

Additional guidance/information provided at the bidders’ conference:

  1. The CoC is compiling project Scorecards for each renewal project. The Scorecards summarize information that demonstrates project performance and is used for scoring projects in the CoC competition.
  2. Applicants are permitted to include with RFP responses one page (no larger than 8.5 x 11) which provides explanation about one or more of the scoring factors as applied to their project. For example, the page can include information about why scoring did not meet expectations. The page should be submitted with required documents at the time that these are submitted to the Springfield Office of Housing. The single page of explanation is optional, and is not a required part of the competition.


CoC Request for Proposals – Seeking Projects to Include in FY2017 CoC Competition

The CoC has released its Request for Proposals (RFP), seeking projects to include in its FY 2017 CoC Competition Application to HUD.

The RFP is available here:  Hampden County CoC Competition FY2017.

The schedule for the competition is as follows:

August 2               Release RFP

August 15             Optional bidders’ conference

August 28             Deadline for submittal of complete applications

September 13      Ranking and selection decisions posted

September 25      Full CoC application posted on CoC website

September 28     CoC Application submitted to HUD

Any updates or corrections will be posted on this website. Applicants should subscribe to make sure that they receive any additional information.